The Magic Moment

Nowadays most people in the world were faint in their own religion, but some people didn’t have the religion because they believed in own lifestyle. People lifestyle had change a lot from ancient but a lot of the religion and some ancient philosophies still apply to use in the age of globalization. It shown the religions always got accepted by most of the people and they also apply the religion in their lifestyle in very age. In Thailand people faint in Buddhism since the Sukhothai era until now more than 700 years, monk still same as before their job is to teach people to do good things and they were the sanctuary for the people even the time past by their job still same to teach people to be a better man. The ancient Chinese philosophy more than 2500 years most of the Chinese philosophy thought people to life in a happy life and a lot of great idea of life. Some Chinese people apply ancient Chinese philosophy to a war’s plan and to control people. It was shown that the idea of ancient Chinese could apply to many ways and it also thought people to be a better man. Indian philosophy and ancient Chinese philosophy had the same objective that both of them want to keep people life in happy life without any conflict, but nowadays our societies still had a lot of problem that we couldn’t really know the cause of them.

Buddhism begins with a question about what causes this suffering? How to get free from suffer? The answer is because we want so we suffer. I believe that if we can lay down and made the life go on without any problem so we will not suffer. Buddhism believes in law of Karma which covers three things: what an individual acts, speaks, and thinks. Before we kill anything our mind thinks we must kill, so whatever we do past our mind first. All we got in this life is comes from a result of what we did in the past and what we does in the present will determine what he will be in the future life. I agree that Buddhism teach us to not blame other made the Buddhist think this life depend on last life and we can made a good future by do good thing. I always believe in this law because I’m Buddhist.  I never blame other people I always think that I have a good life today because I did a lot of good thing in my past life.

One of the oldest Indian philosophy and in the world is Hinduism it different from the other world religion such as Christianity, Islam and Buddhism but I accept that the teaching of Hinduism is great. I believe in law of Karma that if we do only good thing one day we will get reward from what we did, and if we do bad one day people will know and we will get bad respond from it. But one thing in the earliest period of Hinduism that I disagree is the class system. I believe that everyone should have right freedom to do what they want in limited of not affect the in society. Now Hinduism had developed since ancient times. The idea of Monism and the Idealism it is one of greatest idea that I believe in it. Monism refers to the idea that everything in the universe belongs to the same class. Idealism is the theory that spirit, not matter, is the reality. It made me surprise when I first heard this idea, it made me have a lot of new idea that people might be just only thing and we may not live in reality world. I also believe in The True self or Atman the way they thing is very interesting for me, each human is an individual who separated from other individuals. The true self philosophy is hard to choose which side I should believe because all The True Self philosophy had a great reason to explain what they prove. I don’t believe in the way to Enlighten in Hinduism that one way to enlightenment is to practice meditation, I don’t believe that our mind can have more powerful and have power to see the truth. I believe in science that electricity can made light, engine of car made it can run.

Most of the ancient Chinese philosophy was teaching about life. There were a lot of good idea, teaching way of life and thinking. I impress with the Fung Yu-Lan teaching, he believe that Chinese philosophy is primarily philosophy of sageliness within and kingliness without which mean in mind must be sage but in action must be a king. If a lot of people follow this philosophy and apply to lifestyle the society will better and most people will happy. K’ung Ch’iu or Master Kung is very popular philosophy even in Thailand a lot of people apply his teaching in lifestyle and in their business. I don’t really believe the righteousness which means the oughtness of a situation. It said everyone action for the profit I disagree with it because when I give money to the bagger I didn’t get any profit and I also lose my money I just poor them so I give. About Human-heartmess I accept this philosophy that people didn’t love something because it gives benefit to him. About Philosophy Do for Nothing I think we should do for something because if we have no point why should we do for, but if we do nothing it might be good for people because people would not serious about it so they wouldn’t care what they do for and if they didn’t succeed it will be ok.
            Lao Tzu’ teachings the rule to enlightenment, if the human wants to achieve anything, he started from opposite. This word is very intelligent idea because when I started to improve something I must think that I not good enough I want to be better. I think Lao Tzu is right to said that we shouldn’t know too much of thing because if we know a lot we will think a lot that is not very necessary for our life to survive, such as if I know that new laptop technology that better than my old one so I want new but if I don’t know that there was a better one I still use my old one. I accept that the knowledge made more problems to society but I still want to know more because I think human nurture the god made people have brain to keep the knowledge and to make me feel challenge when I learn something new.

    October 2007

           More than 20 years Burmese emigrate from their country to Thailand, the democratic country. Most of Burmese want their country to be Democratic. The human right organization help Burmese fought to change Burmese to be democratic, but Chinese and Japanese government who got a lot of benefit from Burmese dictatorial government. They didn’t care what happen in Burma by the dictatorial government which was the most brutal government in the world. In Burma now it was a biggest protest in the world very country look up at Burma. Most of the countries want to help Burmese citizen from the dictatorial government.  The human right organization cry out for UN and the citizen for stop the dictatorial government violence. Thailand president said that the dictatorial perform is unacceptable for him and it wrong to use violence to control people. The member of UN meeting about the Burma crisis to find the way to help Burma but there still had Chinese that disagree to help Burma.

            The council of UN meeting for solve problem in Burma and sent Ibrahim Gumbari who was the special agent from UN to Burma. Gumbari was the hope for stop Burma from used violence to citizen. Gumbari went to Burma with two objectives. The first one was to stop Burmese government from killing the protest and citizen. The second was Gumbari want to meet the political prisoners. UN didn’t decide what to punish Burma government because China and Russia thought it was not their problem but it was problem in country we shouldn’t intervene in Burma.

            ASEAN minister have plan to not intervene Burma government but they call out by the hard statement and abuse for Burma. ASEAN want Burma government stop using violence to the protests and tried to find to way to solve violence in Burma include build up unity and the democratic in Burma. The US government declares to freeze money and assets in foreign country of Burmese government leader and their families by got help by all banks around the world, also not sold weapon to Burma and cut military help.

If the Burma still used violence to the protest and citizen UN might be used to last measure which was sent troops to Burma for look over the country but this have to pass agreement from the high council which were America, England, France, China and Russia. But it was hard to pass the agreement, because China and Russia were spoiling the Burma dictatorial government. We only can hope that everyone will help to get the peaceful and democracy in Burma as soon as possible because last 20 years Burmese citizen lived in poverty, a lot of innocent citizen dead for their democracy.

Khachen Techahadsadin
507030

Parmenides

            Parmenides was a Philosopher whose chief philosophical contribution was a radically novel interpretation of the phenomenon change. Parmenides the concept of change was logically. He said that whatever exists must be absolutely, or not at all and said, that anything should come into is, simply is. I agree with his concept which said whatever exists must be absolutely because whatever we saw, touch, smell is came from something that can prove by the scientific, and also whatever exists I thought it real and reality.

            Parmenides said, that “anything should come into being… out of not being.” It was the concept of “coming into being” or “becoming”. I’m also agreeing with his concept of being. Anything should come into being out of not being. It everything have being and it come into being. Like something exists it had to have somehow being such as rain it didn’t come by itself have  some cause to made it rain, everything before exist it have being. We can’t find something that had not being.  Parmenides said that “it is the same thing can be thought that can be”.”You will not find thinking without being to which it refers. To think is to think about something and for the reason you cannot think of anything changing or coming into being. I agree with his concept of think everyone before thinking of something must be had reason to think like why they started to think it have beginning of think. When I was thinking about something I will always being to think because I feel something from 5 senses.

            Wherein lies the absurdity of saying that “something comes into being”? It lies, said Parmenides, in the impossibility of saying consistently or coherently that something can arise ether out of being or out of non-being. His concept about impossibility to had something can arise out of being I disagree with him because may be something might be had non-being his reason not enough to made me believe him be and for me something might be have non-being because even something can have never ending.  For our world we don’t really know when it being and when it will be end, even if this world will be end soon so I believe that it will had another world or new world somewhere.

            Speaking of all reality as It, Parmenides says that “one path only is left for us to speak of, namely, that It is. In this path are very many tokens that what is, is uncreated and indestructible, for it is complete, immovable and without end”. Parmenides said there is as much being in one place as in another, and there is no empty space. It or reality is material in nature and is finite. I disagree with his idea about It because I think reality isn’t material it something real and had history for long time, we can feel about It. Parmenides said that there is no empty space I think there was an empty space and it will not be finite because space is very huge it should have some where empty like nothing there and it will not be finite because even space is big but I think I will be have something bigger than space like, before ancient people thought the world is center of galaxy and thought that galaxy is biggest and have only one galaxy. Really there was a lot of galaxy same as space there should have something bigger than space or another space.

            Parmenides rejects the common-sense notion of change by his distinction between appearance and reality. Change, he said, is the confusion of appearance with reality and therefore, change is simply an illusion. I agree with his idea because he said that appearance cannot produce more that opinion, whereas reality is the basis of truth. Our opinion is base on sensation must, says Parmenides, yield to the activity of reason, which is able to discern the truth about things, and reason tells us that if there is a single substance of which everything consists, then there can be no movement or change. I was the great idea in my opinion

            Parmenides was one of the great philosopher in ancient Greece Parmenides was a student of Ameinias and the founder of the School of Elea, which also included Zeno of Elea. He giving Elea people laws and establishing a new school of philosophy whose followers became known as Eleatics. He visit Socrates and have conversed with him. He made next generation of him used his idea to discover new philosophy.